BUSINESS

"Job Cuts Threaten Canada’s Food Safety and Security"

21.05.2026 5,90 B 5 Mins Read

OTTAWA — New Democrats and various unions are expressing concerns that recent federal job cuts and the closure of research facilities may jeopardize food safety and security across Canada. The federal government's announcement indicates plans to eliminate over 650 positions at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Additionally, the Agriculture Union reports that around 600 jobs will be cut at the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA).

This year, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada also revealed intentions to shut down three research and development centers and four satellite research farms in an effort to reduce costs. Among the affected locations are the Lacombe Research and Development Centre in Alberta, the Quebec Research and Development Centre, and the Nappan Experimental Farm in Nova Scotia.

Milton Dyck, the national president of the Agriculture Union, emphasized that Canada's food safety system relies on two key elements: inspection and agricultural research. He warned that both are now under threat. “The time to act is now,” he stated, stressing the importance of preventing Canadians from falling ill due to avoidable food-borne illnesses and protecting farmers from the risks of drought and crop failures.

Data from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency disclosed a staggering 150 percent increase in food recalls between 2013 and 2023, soaring to over 150 recalls from fewer than 60. In response to the impending cuts, the union initiated a campaign condemning the government's decisions, asserting that it is “hollowing out the whole system.”

Sean O'Reilly, president of the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada, conveyed his concerns to The Canadian Press, stating that government savings should never come at the cost of food safety protection. He noted that nearly one million hours of food safety expertise have been lost at CFIA, coinciding with rising recall cases and numerous uninspected facilities due to ongoing staffing shortages. O'Reilly emphasized that food safety is a vital public service that families and exporters depend on, highlighting the potential consequences of insufficient investment.

NDP agriculture critic Gord Johns described the cuts as “risky,” particularly in light of skyrocketing food prices and challenges posed by climate change. He articulated concerns that weakening food inspection and agricultural science resources not only poses a public health risk but also threatens the economic stability of Canada’s agriculture and food sectors. He insisted that public confidence and strong inspection systems are crucial for Canada’s agricultural industry.

Johns warned that the impacts could ripple across exports, challenging the country's international reputation. “This could hurt farmers, it could hurt producers, processors, and those that are exporting right across our country,” he remarked.

In response to the criticism, Alexandre Bergeron, a spokesperson for the health minister's office, communicated that the Canadian Food Inspection Agency is “reorienting” its spending to align with its core priorities, assuring that no services to Canadians will be compromised. He claimed that the agency is increasing investments in food safety and inspection while maintaining its primary goal of protecting public health and safety.

Furthermore, a recent House of Commons committee report recommended that the government reverse its decision to close agricultural research centers and experimental farms, citing significant economic benefits tied to investments in agricultural science and innovation. John Barlow, a Conservative MP and vice-chair of the committee, expressed surprise at the cuts and warned that they could be “catastrophic.”

Barlow noted that the savings from closing these facilities would amount to approximately $230 million over the next decade, concluding that this is a substantial cost for minimal savings. He mentioned that alternatives for cost-saving measures were presented to the government in hopes of preserving the research centers.

This situation has raised alarms amongst stakeholders, stressing the need for urgent and effective action to secure the future of Canada’s food safety and agricultural systems in light of the proposed job cuts and facility closures.

Related Post