The Ford government in Ontario is re-evaluating some components of its recent omnibus bill, which critics argue could lead to the dismantling of rent control and tenant security. This reassessment follows significant backlash from various stakeholders, including tenant advocacy groups and political figures.
On October 23, Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Rob Flack introduced Bill 60, the Fighting Delays, Building Faster Act, highlighting the aim of streamlining the approval processes for new housing developments and expediting the overall construction of homes. In addition to these objectives, the legislation purportedly seeks to address certain rental issues, such as the existing delays within the Landlord and Tenant Board. Notably, it proposes reducing the notification duration required for evicting tenants due to unpaid rent.
The government's briefing notes on Bill 60 indicated that they are exploring alternate options concerning lease expiry. Under the current system, tenants have the right to remain in their units even after their lease term has expired, provided they adhere to the rental agreement's stipulations. Although no concrete changes have been suggested thus far, the province has announced intentions to consult on potential adjustments that could offer landlords increased flexibility and consequently trigger the availability of more rental units.
However, in a contrary statement made via social media on Sunday, Flack declared that the government would not be moving forward with consultations regarding possible modifications to Ontario's tenancy lease framework, specifically in relation to month-to-month leases. Flack emphasized, “Residents expect stability and predictability in Ontario’s rental market, and now is not the time to consider changes to this system.” He asserted that the provincial government remains committed to implementing practical reforms designed to enhance the functioning of the rental housing market by restoring equilibrium at the Landlord and Tenant Board and deterring system abuse while promoting new rental construction.
Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow expressed relief that the provincial government has opted against considering alterations to tenant 'security of tenure,' a move she characterized as potentially disastrous for half of Toronto's renter population and a boon for large corporate landlords. Chow acknowledged the vital role of tenant organizations in amplifying renters' concerns and urged the provincial government to eliminate other provisions in Bill 60 that could undermine renters’ rights, including those affecting compensation protocols for tenants evicted through no fault of their own. She stressed the necessity of safe, secure, and affordable housing for all residents.
City Councilor Josh Matlow labeled the proposed changes in Bill 60 as the most “radical and harmful” to tenant protections ever proposed, warning that they could lead to “significant increases in homelessness.” To voice his opposition, Matlow has initiated a petition against the legislation and intends to present a motion at city council against it.
The opposition New Democratic Party (NDP) has condemned the bill, arguing that it is designed to eliminate rent control across the province, which would consequently trigger “mass evictions.” NDP Shadow Minister for Housing, Catherine McKenney, criticized the government's focus on facilitating evictions during a time when Ontario is grappling with a job crisis. McKenney emphasized that the solution lies in developing more housing rather than infringing upon renters' rights. She called for genuine rent control measures to safeguard tenants’ interests in Ontario.
